 |
|
|
|
Year 2012 - Volume 32, Number 1
|
|
Microbiology, histology and immunology evaluation of broiler chickens challenged against Salmonella Enteritidis and Minnesota and treated with organic acids, 32(1):22-31
|
ABSTRACT.- Pickler L., Hayashi R.M., Lourenço M.C., Miglino L.B., Caron L.F., Beirão B.C.B., Silva A.V.F. & Santin E. 2012. [Microbiology, histology and immunology evaluation of broiler chickens challenged against Salmonella Enteritidis and Minnesota and treated with organic acids.] Avaliação microbiológica, histológica e imunológica de frangos de corte desafiados com Salmonella Enteritidis e Minnesota e tratados com ácidos orgânicos. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 32(1):27-36. Laboratório de Microbiologia e Ornitopatologia, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Rua dos Funcionários 1540, Curitiba, PR 80035-050, Brazil. E-mail: larissapickler@yahoo.com.br
Two experiments were carried out to evaluate effectiveness of organic acids against Salmonella enterica enterica serovars Enteritidis (SE) and Minnesota (SM) in broilers. In the first experiment three treatments were evaluated: T1 - feeding with organic acids, T2 - feeding with organic acids and organic acids in drink water, and T3 - control group. All animals were oral challenged with SE. Organic acids in diet (T1) and organic acids in diet and drink water (T2) reduced the shadding of Salmonella in crop and cecum 7 days post challenged with SE and reduced the CD3+ cells in jejunal mucosa of broilers. In the second experiment four treatments were evaluated, T1 - control group, T2 - control group oral challenged with Salmonella Minnesota (SM); T3 - oral challenged animals with SM and treated with organic acids in diet; T4 - oral challenged animals with SM and treated with organic acids in diet and in drink water. Organic acids in diet (T3) and organic acids in diet and in drink water (T4) reduced the shadding of SM in crop of challenged broilers, 7 days post inoculation The use of organic acids in diet and in water was more effective to control SE than SM. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
